Masonry Magazine January 2011 Page. 36
LEGAL ISSUES
By William Groh
From Bad to Worse: Keeping Fraud out of Breach of Contract
Fraud claims can carry potentially severe consequences not ordinarily associated with claims for simple breach of contract, and have increasingly found their way into situations traditionally associated with breach of contract. It is important for contractors to recognize the difference between these two distinct claims, in order to reduce risk and guard against potentially damaging claims.
Even with the best of intentions, a contractor has many opportunities to make mistakes, to become overextended, or make promises that, ultimately, go unfulfilled. As contractors and customers alike rightfully focus on the importance of "keeping one's word," broken promises and disappointed expectations can lead frustrated customers to confuse unintentionally defective work and bad results with dishonesty and even fraud.
What is fraud, legally?
Fraud is more than simple failure to keep one's word, and does not arise simply because a predicted result never materialized. Fraud is defined as a false representation of material fact that one party makes intentionally and knowingly, intending to mislead, and which causes the other party to rely on the false representation and suffer damages.1 A contractor with 10 years of landscaping experience may commit fraud by saying "I have 20 years of landscaping experience," but probably does not commit fraud by saying "I am an experienced landscaper."
Implications of fraud claims for corporations, individuals
The practical difference between fraud and breach of contract is far beyond semantic. Fraud is predicated on dishonest conduct, and courts generally require that a party plead fraud with specificity. This often means that a complaint for fraud will name the individual who committed the fraud, and specifically accuse that individual of dishonest conduct. A complaint stating these claims is a matter of public record for all to see.
Beyond reputational concerns, a fraud claim carries liability risks not generally found in a typical breach of contract case. For example, if a limited-liability company fails to meet a construction deadline or make a payment to a supplier, owners and employees of the LLC generally are not liable for breach of contract, unless they signed a personal guaranty to the contract. If an owner or employee commits fraud, however, that individual can share personal liability with the company, even though he was acting as the company's agent at the time. This liability also may include punitive damages.
Half-remembered conversations and misunderstandings often can blur the line between breach of contract and fraud, leading to serious but, ulti-