John H. Fanning


Roles


Masonry Magazine October 1982 Page. 34
October 1982

vision defeats the viability of the first obligation

Rather, so long as all parties are bound by one of two dispute settlement procedures, there exists a binding agreed-upon method of settlement. Under these circumstances, the existence of the

Masonry Magazine September 1981 Page. 15
September 1981



The following factors are relevant in making the determination of the dispute before us:

# 1. Collective-bargaining agreements
The Laborers and the Respondent have contract support for their claims to the disputed work. The Labore

Masonry Magazine June 1981 Page. 25
June 1981

4. Skills, safety, economy, and efficiency of operation
The record discloses that the Employer teaches both bricklayers and laborers the skills required to perform all aspects of the disputed work. As a result of this training, the Employer's employe

Masonry Magazine September 1980 Page. 19
September 1980


evidence, that it may be bound to the assignment-of-work provision of the contract, we find that the contractual assignment factor favors neither Union. Accordingly, this factor does not favor an award to either Union.

2. Employer Past Pr

Masonry Magazine January 1977 Page. 39
January 1977

MCAA Information
(Continued from page 36)

Scope of Award
Both Iacono and the Laborers request that the operation of the forklift on the construction site at the corner of Riverview Drive and Madison Road, Totowa, New Jersey, be awarded

Masonry Magazine May 1976 Page. 30
May 1976

Advertisers Index...
LET THEM KNOW YOU SAW IT IN MASONRY

AA Wire Products Company 20
Anchor Manufacturing Company 24, 30
Bil-Jax, Inc. 21
Bullard Abrasive Products, Inc. 5
Robert G. Evans Company (Target) 12, 31
Felker Op

Masonry Magazine October 1973 Page. 25
October 1973

MCAA Information
(Continued from page 27) find no compelling reason for disturbing the Employer's assignment of the work to employees represented by the Laborers. In making this determination, we are awarding the work in question to employees represe

Masonry Magazine May 1973 Page. 27
May 1973

MCAA Information
(Continued from page 12)
is consistent with contracts, employer practice, efficiency, and economy of operation. In making this determination, we are awarding the work in question to employees represented by Bricklayers, but not t

Masonry Magazine January 1972 Page. 35
January 1972

MCAA Information

(Continued from page 8) advised all parties that the work in dispute was to be assigned to the Carpenters. On March 12, before the award had been complied with, a representative of Hahn called Felix Espinosa of Respondent Counci

Masonry Magazine December 1969 Page. 36
December 1969



NLRB Decision
(Continued from page 34)

The Employer has no contract with Carpenters' Local 200. The record discloses that masonry scaffolding is erected as the masonry work progresses and that the time spent erecting and dismantli

Masonry Magazine January 1969 Page. 43
January 1969

NLRB Decisions

Employees employed by Seedorff Masonry, Inc., who are represented by Construction and General Laborers Local 1238, AFL-CIO, are entitled to perform the work of erecting and dismantling all-metal tubular scaffolding used by Seedorf

Masonry Magazine January 1969 Page. 44
January 1969

NLRB Decisions

S & W contends that Respondent did violate the Act, that S&W is not bound by any contractual obligation or by any agreement to submit the dispute to the Joint Board, that the skills possessed by employees represented by Laborers a